Maj-Gen Senona
Provincial Head of the DPCI in KZN
1,021 claims4 scheme(s)6 contradiction(s)
Schemes linked
SC0001Matlala / SAPS Health Risk Management / Medicare 24 conSC0002Tembisa Hospital extraction schemeSC0011Cocaine exhibit theft and premature destructionSC0016KZN DPCI evidence tampering and Matlala intelligence pi
What the record shows (1,021 claims total — showing first 12)
position
head of DPCI in KwaZulu -Natal
Day 8 · Lieutenant General Khumalo · CL0007081
association with matlala linked to
commercial venture between Mr Matlala and Mr Thato Senona
Day 8 · Lieutenant General Khumalo · CL0007191
expressed concern about
Mr Matlala's tender with the SAPS
Day 12 · Adv Hassim SC · CL0008382
assisted with
payment of invoices submitted by Mr Matlala's company, Medicare 24 Tshwane
Day 12 · Adv Hassim SC · CL0008383
message content
a picture of a thank you
Day 12 · Adv Hassim SC · CL0008386
message content
I trust that you are fine under the circumstances.
Day 12 · Adv Hassim SC · CL0008387
message content
That is great news, my brother. I am coming back that side tomorrow, a week.
Day 12 · Adv Hassim SC · CL0008389
forwarded documents significance
unclear at this stage
Day 12 · Adv Hassim SC · CL0008409
witness for day
Lt-Gen Senona
Day 47 · Adv Hassim SC · CL0044948
attendance status
in attendance
Day 47 · Adv Hassim SC · CL0044949
leave requirement for date
special leave
Day 47 · Ms Mafisa · CL0044957
duty
testify before this Commission
Day 47 · Adv Hassim SC · CL0044966
Contradictions
● Certain
assumed position date
Stated
2020-09-01Conflicting claim
2020-08-01◎ Likely
(cross-phrasing)
Cannot both not hear Matlala's company implicated yet be unable to avoid hearing developments in the same scandal.
◎ Likely
(cross-phrasing)
A asserts Senona knew the referent; B is his denial of knowing the same referent—cannot both be true.
◎ Likely
(cross-phrasing)
A says it could have continued indefinitely; B claims it was going to be ended—mutually exclusive about same conduct's future.
◎ Likely
(cross-phrasing)
A asserts the sharing reason was to ensure he sees it; B explicitly denies that context, so both cannot hold.
◎ Likely
(cross-phrasing)
Cannot both be first time seeing it via Commission and have seen it before.