Lebogang Andrew Phiri
Inspector for Assets Protection Services at the time
360 claims1 scheme(s)2 contradiction(s)
Schemes linked
What the record shows (360 claims total — showing first 12)
assignment
assigned to the APSS as a regional supervisor
Day 84 · Commissioner Spies · CL0085229
reports to
Senior Superintendent Madihlaba
Day 84 · Commissioner Spies · CL0085230
reports to
Colonel Mahlangu
Day 84 · Commissioner Spies · CL0085231
reports to
Director Malatji
Day 84 · Commissioner Spies · CL0085232
action taken
deployed under direct instruction of Director Malatji
Day 84 · Commissioner Spies · CL0085234
role
regional supervisor monitoring the guards and monitoring that the function is actually done
Day 84 · Commissioner Spies · CL0085245
authority
does not have the authority to deploy or incur any cost on behalf of the city
Day 84 · Commissioner Spies · CL0085279
alleged conduct
issuing written instructions to Gubis85 Security Solution to deploy ad hoc guards which is way beyond his mandate
Day 84 · Commissioner Spies · CL0085323
action taken
issued further deployment letters
Day 85 · Commissioner Faro (Chief of Police) · CL0086107
employment status
on suspension
Day 85 · Commissioner Faro (Chief of Police) · CL0086399
action characterisation
not what should have been done
Day 85 · Commissioner Faro (Chief of Police) · CL0086401
role
assisting at APSS with movement of staff
Day 85 · Commissioner Faro (Chief of Police) · CL0086404
Contradictions
◎ Likely
(cross-phrasing)
A asserts deployment was under Malatji's direct instruction; B asserts Phiri acted on his own without instruction—directly contradictory on same act.
◎ Likely
(cross-phrasing)
Claim A asserts authority/delegation was given to issue letters; Claim B denies any instruction and says Phiri acted on his own—cannot both be true.