Schemes linked
SC0001Matlala / SAPS Health Risk Management / Medicare 24 conSC0006Crime Intelligence Secret Services AccountSC0007Carrim / Mogotsi / Matlala loan chain + ANC event paymeSC0017Contact agent infiltration and SAPS influence network
What the record shows (1,206 claims total — showing first 12)
association
associate of the Minister
Day 2 · Lt Gen Mkhwanazi · CL0001455
relationship to minister
associate of the Minister of Police
Day 2 · Lt Gen Mkhwanazi · CL0001968
relationship to minister
close associate with the Minister
Day 2 · Lt Gen Mkhwanazi · CL0001972
knowledge of minister office
knows things that are happening at the office of the Minister
Day 2 · Lt Gen Mkhwanazi · CL0001974
association
linked to the underworld figures
Day 2 · Lt Gen Mkhwanazi · CL0001975
relationship to minister
close to the Minister
Day 2 · Lt Gen Mkhwanazi · CL0001978
confirmed by
Chief of Staff
Day 2 · Lt Gen Mkhwanazi · CL0002003
identification method
I got his number checked, officially so, and it was confirmed it is a number that is registered on record under his name.
Day 2 · Lt Gen Mkhwanazi · CL0002004
employment
not in the Police
Day 3 · Lt Gen Mkhwanazi · CL0002273
travel route
no direct flight from North West to Empangeni
Day 3 · Lt Gen Mkhwanazi · CL0002276
travel requirement
two flights at least
Day 3 · Lt Gen Mkhwanazi · CL0002277
action taken
sent further screenshots
Day 3 · Lt Gen Mkhwanazi · CL0002288
Contradictions
◎ Likely
(cross-phrasing)
A denies knowing about plot in October; B asserts he knew about the plot, motivating his mention of Khan. Both about same plot knowledge.
◎ Likely
(cross-phrasing)
A denies being a member/director; B asserts deposing affidavits as named member of same foundation—mutually exclusive on membership.
◎ Likely
(cross-phrasing)
He claims he is not refusing to answer, yet states he will not answer the question—directly contradictory about same conduct.
◎ Likely
(cross-phrasing)
A requests meetings outside the office; B states meetings occurred at his office—directly opposing on same referent.
◎ Likely
(cross-phrasing)
Claim A asserts he tried to persuade; Claim B is his direct denial of persuading—same act, cannot both be true.
◎ Likely
(cross-phrasing)
One asserts belief in him, the other explicitly denies belief; cannot both be true of same referent.