WhatTheySaid.co.zaThe Madlanga Commission record, in plain language
other2024E000301

Alleged manipulation of security vetting in Crime Intelligence

Claims allege that security vetting processes within Crime Intelligence were manipulated to grant unlawful clearances to favoured individuals, including General Madondo.

Described by 4 witnesses
Advocate Johnsonday 148, day 149Brian Padayachee (Senior Investigator, IDAC;day 150Chief Perumalday 154Advocate Ramsamyday 154
Each of these people gave first-hand evidence about this event. Several accounts of the same event is a property of the record — it is not verification, and witnesses can be mistaken together.
25 claims from testimony
"unlawful issuing of security clearances in favour of certain persons within Crime Intelligence"
subject matterAdv Sello SCCL0158168
"This investigation pertains to manipulation of security vetting processes, which resulted in the unlawful issuing of security clearances in favour of personnel within the division Crime Intelligence of the South African Service."
textSummons to National Commissioner dated 6 February 2025section 28 summons dated 6 February 2025CL0158216
"in favour of personnel within the division Crime Intelligence of the South African Service"
scopeCrime Intelligence Division (SAPS)section 28 summons dated 6 February 2025CL0158219
"and General Madondo"
"from a certain rank, they are all supposed to have security clearances as per their own internal requirements"
statusCrime Intelligence Division (SAPS)Advocate JohnsonCL0158675
"not having security clearance at a specific rank does not allow you to occupy that rank."
statusCrime Intelligence Division (SAPS)Advocate JohnsonCL0158676
"it cannot happen in three days. There is checks, there is, you have got to go and do background checks, financial checks, there is quite a few things that must happen."
statusCrime Intelligence Division (SAPS)Advocate JohnsonCL0158682
"knowing that she failed to secure a top secret clearance"
"was also refused a top secret clearance while she held the rank of Brigadier"
employment statusMajor-General Nosipho Precious Madondo (SAPS Crime Intelligence)statement from a very senior officialCL0160834
"She does not have a top secret security clearance, which is a requirement for her to be employed as senior manager in the Crime Intelligence Division"
security clearanceMajor-General Nosipho Precious Madondo (SAPS Crime Intelligence)Colonel PadayacheeCL0162698
"which is a requirement for her to be employed as senior manager in the Crime Intelligence Division"
requirementCrime Intelligence Division (SAPS)Colonel PadayacheeCL0162699
"It should never have gone because Crime Intelligence has their own vetting"
indicatedMr PerumalCL0171225
"Crime Intelligence has their own vetting"
capabilityCrime Intelligence Division (SAPS)Ms RamsamyCL0171226
"her security clearance or top, application for top security clearance was refused"
"Madondo will never have one"
security clearance statusMajor-General Nosipho Precious Madondo (SAPS Crime Intelligence)Mr Adams MPCL0189668
"You mistake him for somebody as a General in Crime Intelligence"
believed affiliationFadiel AdamsAdv Segeels-NcubeCL0189720
"crime intelligence"
made recommendations onLieutenant-Colonel Deenadayalan "Deena" GovenderLieutenant Colonel GovenderCL0190884
"a security clearance has been issued to that person in terms of section 2(a)(6) of the National Strategic Intelligence Act of 1994, Act Number 39 of 1994, by the head of Crime Intelligence Division of the service"
issued byNational Strategic Intelligence Act of 1994CL0196053
"Crime Intelligence is only capable of vetting 15%"
vetting capacity percentCrime Intelligence Division (SAPS)Doctor LebeyaCL0196071
"it takes over six months to complete vetting on someone who is recommended for vetting before appointment in a senior management service post in the Hawks"
vetting durationCrime Intelligence Division (SAPS)Doctor LebeyaCL0196072
"Vetting is an area where Crime Intelligence is achieving 15 percent of Hawks vetting instead of 100 percent"
vetting achievement percentCrime Intelligence Division (SAPS)the affidavitCL0196829
"instead of 100 percent, as required by section 17(e)(2) of the South African Police Service Act"
required vetting percentCrime Intelligence Division (SAPS)the affidavitCL0196830
"This is an area where the system is dismally failing"
system statusCrime Intelligence Division (SAPS)the affidavitCL0196832
"It is also the responsibility of intelligence services in other environment"
responsibilityCrime Intelligence Division (SAPS)Doctor LebeyaCL0203873
"they also are unable to do that"
abilityCrime Intelligence Division (SAPS)Doctor LebeyaCL0203874